Roberts did not “reproach” Trump when he made a statement against the judges. He bent his knee.
Donald Trump welcomes the US Supreme Court John Roberts Supreme Court upon speech on the joint session of Congress on March 4, 2025.
(Jim Watson / AFP via Getty Images)
Donald Trump, his Ghouls Chief Stephen Miller and his King White Ethno -Nationalism, Tom Homan, calling on federal judges “robber” who dared to try to apply the law to Trump and his administration. Most recently, on Tuesday, Trump called for impeachment of US district judge James E. Baasberg, who ordered Trump to stop the Venezuelans’ deportation to Salvador – the Trump’s order was ignored.
Trump’s call for impeachment (and the actual articles of impeachment, which the Republicans in the Congress attempted to make Targa), seemed to call the Main Court of the Supreme Court John Roberts, and pushed him to pull the weapons that most preferred the institutions to fight the fascist. Roberts made a statement In full reads: “For more than two centuries it has been found that impeachment is not a corresponding response to disagreement on the court.
People who know nothing better called this statement to the rare “reproach” seat of the president from the main court. I urge people not to fall on the Okidok and understand Roberts’s statement about what it is: a meaningless driver from a person trying to protect his own growth rather than trying to protect the country from tyrant.
Roberts’s letter, which reports Trump that impeachment is not a “appropriate response” to the court disagreement, similar to what I say Trump that can’t jump off the roof and fly. It’s not a “reproach” to tell anyone that they don’t have to do what they physically do.
Current Issue
For all Trump’s powers (both the ones he has in constitutional and the ones he is unconstitutionally accepted), the impeachment of federal judges is simply not one of them. The impeachment of the federal judge complies with the same rules as the impeachment of the president, so Trump should be familiar with the process. The impeachment accusations must be filed by the House of Representatives and then the Senate presides over the trial. Two -thirds of the Senate voting is obliged to condemn any federal official (including judges) for impeachment. Trump controls the house, but it does not control two -thirds of the Senate. Judge Basberg is not Palestinian, so I do not think that Chuck Sumer will give Trump the additional voices he needs.
And Roberts knows it all. His statement is pointless because she says Trump not to do what he can no longer do. Roberts Sprint to the head of the parade, which is already on the move, just looked the way he was leading it.
Now, let’s see what Roberts no Tell me. Trump directly violates Judge Basberg’s order, but Roberts did not say this. He did not say: “For two centuries, the presidents obeyed the court orders, including a couple of years ago, when I decided that women could die from unwanted pregnancy, and the previous president obeyed my order as compatible SAP.” Instead of punishing Trump for a direct violation of the court ruling, Roberts turned to the “normal review process”. It may seem like Roberts said Trump should judge his differences with Judge Basberg in the usual way, but that he is really Saying that Trump should be ashamed to ignore the lower court’s orders until the Supreme Court can weigh. Refusing to say something about the florial ignorance of Trump in the lower court judicial authority, Roberts literally tells Trump what Trump wants to hear.
Roberts tries to maintain the appearance of power in the face of the president who did not tend to respect her. He desperately tries to avoid judicial confrontation with Trump, while wanting to sound the way he manages. That is why he says Trump, not to do something that he cannot do (impeachment), but not to mention Trump obey the orders that Trump is inclined to ignore.
This is a gentle game, but not the one that Roberts invented. Roberts accepts his signals from another chief judge John Marshal, who tried to preserve the appearance of the judgment in the face of another President Thomas Jefferson, who was prepared to ignore him. All this dance is played in the first case, which each student of law learns in law school: 1803 Marbury v. Madison.
In this case, there were commissions (new positions, including court officials and Judge peace created by the Congress in the Law on the Judicial System of 1801), which President Jefferson did not want to fill. Congress ordered Jefferson to allow commissioners (who were appointed political competitors Jefferson, President John Adams) to enlist his positions as he needed to be done by law, but Jefferson refused. One of the displaced commissioners, William Marber, sued Jefferson James Madison to allow him to go to work. (Does all of this start to sound acquaintance?)
When it came to never I’m going to fill in these commissions. Marshal (who was also appointed Adams) could make all the court rulings in the world, and it would not matter to Jefferson. Marber never got a job, and Jefferson would call Marshal a guerrilla hack and ordered him to go for a pound of sand if he had ordered otherwise.
Thus, the marshal postponed Jefferson and reality. He decided that Jefferson was wrong not to place the commissioners, but it didn’t matter because the whole law of the Congress was unconstitutional, which means that Madison and Jefferson should not follow him. We can say that the marshal “reproached” Madison and Jefferson, but he is sure the hell did not try stop them, or order them to follow the law. Jefferson did not want to post these commissioners, and these commissioners never sat.
Popular
“Spend on the left below to view more authors”Spend →
It is famous for the fact that the marshal created the marshal from the air, the whole concept of “judicial consideration”. The word “unconstitutional” is nowhere in the Constitution. Marshal came up with this and gave his government the only powers to manage what is, not constitutional. The case is remembered as a stunning power to the Supreme Court, but it should not be noticed that it was created in response to the president who was not going to follow any ruling of the Supreme Court against him, and that the results were provided exactly What he wanted.
So with Trump and Roberts. Trump is not going to comply with the Supreme Court ruling, which he does not like, and all who pay attention to that Roberts. The only way to do Roberts avoid Trump’s exposing as unimportant is to postpone Trump on any issue of real imports.
Roberts will undoubtedly try to pull out some John Marshal Jujits in the coming months: he talks about Trump for the process of ignoring the law, but eventually make out that Trump’s laws do not follow in any case unconstitutional. He knows that Trump will violate his orders, so his whole plan will not issue an order that Trump may break. The only time he can govern against Trump will be on how citizenship is unless Trump can obey his orders without fulfilling state and local functionaries who have no direct power. On questions, if Trump has all the power, such as the abduction of immigrants and placing them in federal aircraft, Roberts will close his mouth and the ass is covered.
John Roberts did not reproach Donald Trump. He bend his knee. Trump is an emperor who has no clothes but Roberts is only his main figs.
The hard and chaotic second term Donald Trump is just beginning. In the first month, Trump’s office and his Like -Elon Musk (or this is the opposite?) Proved that nothing is safe from sacrifice at the altar without checking strength and wealth.
Only reliable independent journalism can cut the noise and offer a clear report and analysis based on principle and conscience. Thats what Nation I did 160 years, and that’s what we do now.
Our independent journalism is not Let the injustice go unnoticed or unopposed – and we will give up hope for a better world. Our Writers, editors and checks are ruthlessly working to inform you about you if so much media does not do this of credulity, fear and loyalty.
Nation saw unprecedented times earlier. We draw the strength and recommendations from our history of fundamental progressive journalism during the crisis, and we strive to continue this heritage today.
We strive to raise $ 25,000 during our spring fundraising campaign to ensure that we have resources to expose oligarchs and income trying to rob our republic. Stand behind bold independent journalism and donate to support Nation Today.
Further,
Katrina Vanden Hievel
Editorial director and publisher, A Nation
More than Nation
The president plans to sign the executive order that manages officials to take all the “necessary steps” to close the department, but the complete closure will require the Conggian act …
On March 20, 2025, as a matter of 1803, explains John Roberts’s approach to Donald Trump, mass deportation technique should be impossible to stop. But any car can be a brother …
The richest man in the world is the largest fine on behalf of the right efforts under the control of the Supreme Court.
The racist shade to the hacking government Elon Musk is terribly reflecting the vision of cyberpunk about the future – especially a science fiction that comes out of South Africa.
In good for racist business, the administration has completed a ban on individual facilities for federal contractors.
The appearance of JB Pritzker at the center of American progress met with a loud reception. But is it an elevation on the national scene to get to the workers?
