Trump’s bizarre statement that he had fallen with the accused of children, because Epstein “stole” workers from Mar-a-lago only raises more fierce questions.

US President Donald Trump speaks during a bilateral meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starr on Golf Ternberry in Scotland on July 28, 2025.
(Christopher Furlong / pool / AFP)
Donald Trump – this Decided by the rapistaccused of sexual abuse or attacking dozens of women. Also he seems to be in a serious cognitive decline. Such a combination of factors almost guarantees that the history of his connection with a convicted sexual criminal Jeffrey Epstein, who is accused of trading children before he died in prison, is still unfolding.
On Monday, Trump gave a long, sometimes inconspicuous press conference together with British Prime Minister Keir Starr. They allegedly met to discuss tariffs, but the issues that were included in Epstein. Instead of hitting on them or ignored, as it is sometimes, Trump responded to them. For a long time. And very strange.
Trump claimed he had fallen with Epstein years ago. In 2004 they competing For the same Haudi property, Palm Bich, and Trump exceeded his friend and received it. (In some Epstein’s information was the one who broke friendships over it.)
Sounds plausible because Two flake guys.
Some of Trump’s communications say Trump expelled Epstein from Mar-a-lago ‘For being crawling“According to the Servant Stephen Chung.
But at a press conference on Monday, Trump gave another explanation. And horrible.
“For years I wouldn’t talk to Jeffrey Epstein because he did what was inappropriate … He stole the people who worked on me. And he did it again. So I threw it out of the place (Mar-a-lago). I am glad.”
My first reaction was that “inappropriate” seems weak beer to describe the imprisonment of Epstein for “the need and purchase of minors for prostitution“But no, Trump didn’t talk about it. Then I remembered that the convicted sex-ghislaine sex actually hired 16-year-old Virginia Jufre, daughter Mar-A-Lago Manager from work as a combination, what Trump thinks?
Remember that Maxwell called women who worked on her “slave“It seemed that Trump had his own interest in the workers of Mar-a-lago; Mar-a-lago.) Trump, a bizarre, said he never” had the privilege “of visiting the Epstein’s private Caribbean, where most of the sex trading was supposed.
Decades after the first time trying to blow up Epstein and Maxwell’s whistle (and Prince Andrew, who, as she allegedly forced her to have sex several times), Virginia Jufre, reportedly committed suicide in April this year (though her parents doubted her. Her death is an important reminder that none of the women who had been charged with trafficking in human beings.
Trump has kept another aspect of history on Monday when he again denied a “contradictory drawing” of a woman, with hints on numerous common and “secrets” by Epstein and “secrets”, in the book for the 50th anniversary of Epstein. But he allowed that such a book could exist. “They say a lot has been done,” he told reporters. “Many great, successful people.” He cannot resist himself with “great successful people” who have contributed to the Epstein’s book, if such a book exists – it is so, and I predict that we will see it. What’s wrong with him?
And after the Deputy Prosecutor General (and the former Trump’s personal defense lawyer), Todd Blanche spent almost two days in dealing with Maxwell, now 20 years in prison for his crimes), Trump urged: “Well, I was allowed, but no one turned to me. Right now, all the same.
Popular
“Spend on the left below to view more authors”Spend →
It is dangerous that this is one place where Trump’s Lapdogs seem to be a little concerned about how this story goes. On SundaySpeaker at home Gop Mike Johnson, one of Trump’s most reliable frogs unloaded Maxwell’s morality and pardon policy. Should be read in full:
When you ask in my opinion, I think 20 years was Pitt. I think she should have a lifetime imprisonment at least. Think about all these unspeakable crimes. And, as you noted earlier, probably a thousand victims. It is difficult to convey in words how it was evil and that it organized it and was its most. At least under the criminal sanction, I think this is an unforgivable thing. So again, not my decision, but I have a big pause about it, like any reasonable person.
Yes, I see that Johnson holds a woman in the scandal as a “orchestrator” when evidence of this character is suspected. She is more to blame than Epstein? But the rest of his statement is a place.
This is all evidence of the slutty thinking of the elites, be it about the treatment of workers or minor girls as ownership. (From which pious Christian Johnson is almost always glanced at.) It is also felt that the constant cognitive decline of Trump personally difficult to answer or evade questions. He doesn’t want to talk about Epstein, but he also can’t stop talking about Epstein. This story remains with us.
