What professional doctor sees when they supervise the FIV procedure through an animal
Life sciences can be thought of
In Vitro Fertification (FIV) has led to a very automated form of birth, expecting hope to reduce the risk of human defect in such proceedings.
IVF is an intractoplasmic injection of sperm (ICSI), where sperms are injected into a lab dish. This is usually used in cases of male infertility, as the sperm does not work to reach an egg. As a result the embryos are inserted in the uterus. IVF Sperm and Eggs can also be made on a lab dish with the hope that will happen, for less successful, but also requires medical intervention.
ICSI also includes drawbacks, as it is based on the accuracy and trial of medical professionals. “Sometimes they are sometimes tired and distracted, as in most trades like everyone else, the mistakes occur (that they can reduce fertilization and births,” says Jacques Cohen Life in Sciences unthinkable in Biotec Company in New York City.
To deal with this, Cohen and his colleagues have developed a machine that can take 23 steps required for ICSI. Each has a person launched through the press of a button while viewing an animal of the process. It can also be done from another part of the world.
In one step, the machine uses the AI model to choose the healthiest sperms for fertilization, according to its appearance. In another, the machine immobilizes the sperm by crushing the tails with the laser, making it easier to pick up. Later sperm injects to the eggs already collected. A similar approach has been tested before, Two live birthsBut a machine didn’t take a few steps.
To put the machine to test, the researchers hired a couple who were struggling to think, in part because the man could swim properly. The woman also had problems with the production of eggs, so the lender were used for the procedure.
Researchers randomly allocated eight donors from the egg to the egg to fertilize the automated systems, which produced four embryos. The rest of the three eggs fertilized in the ICSI standard manual view, all formed embryos.
Then they used another A- The model to choose the best two embryos, apparition of chromosomes. These two were produced using an automated system, but that does not necessarily mean that this approach is healthier in the embryo than the manual ICSI, according to Cohen. We cannot spread this due to small number of eggs involved.
When the group joined an embryo in the woman’s uterus, he could not develop, but the second led to a successful birth.
It’s an exciting conceptual evidence, he says Joyce Harper University College in London. But those who randomly assign randomly analysis randomly and manual LCSI procedure requires whether the first approaches get higher birth rates.
Automated IVF is also very difficult to use, with an additional expense, at the beginning, the harper says at least. But Cohen expects to improve over time. “Optimizing, standardized and refining the system, we expect the decline in the cost of the patient and the clinic,” he noted.
Themes:
