Trump Administration cancels the scientific policy of integrity
The National Health Institute said he pulled the policy about diversity and inclusion, in accordance with the Trump Administration Directive

Climatewire | The National Institute of Health has revoked the scientific integrity policy by referring the commitment of policy intended to protect research and communication from political interference.
Politics was recreated on Friday afternoon “to ensure alignment of administration preferences”, according to A Note Posted by NIH. The note says the NIH, the largest financing source for world medical research today to continue to follow a wider scientific policy of health and human services.
NIH, as notes says, “he is committed to protecting the principles of scientific integrity.”
To help Science Journalism
If you enjoy this article, consider entering award-winning journalism Subscribe. By purchasing subscription, you are helping to ensure the future of stories about the discoveries and ideas that are conformed to today.
NIH politics, was the last Updated in the last months of the Biden Administration“Diversity, heritage, inclusion and accessibility (call) are comprehensive components of the entire scientific process.”
“Calls can pay attention to the success of scientific worker, promoting innovation in science behavior and use, and offers participation in science by various communities,” Policies said.
HHS politics is not like such diversity to follow NIH.
HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon said that he was pulling as a result of the diversity of politics. The NIH policy, said the Bid Administration “was injected” to “unarmed” call and gender ideology research “.
Restarting the policy, he said: “NIH will allow science to recover its gold standard and protects the integrity of science through HHS policy.”
The movement has alarmed scientists and public health experts, argues that the Trump Administration has already politicized science Eliminating HHS offices In health care and climate change, Research scholarships Racism in health differences and other topics do not like friends and Removal of health data From the HHS website.
“When someone sprouts a policy, they are doing so, because they know they were being violated,” Liz Borkowskik said, Director of the Directorate of Public Health Policy at the University of George Washington at the University of George Washington.
The agency was able to cancel his scientific integrity policy at the second week of Jay Bhattacharya.
Bhattacharya himself has conducted federally funded research on racial health differences, including Writing 2012 paper Black patients found than heart transplants than white patients. Bhattacharya told Senator that he would not accept the President Nih Donald Trump to limit the financing and communications for initiatives that promote diversity, inclusion, and equity.
“The health needs of the minorities in this country are essential for me,” Angela Alsomrooks said to husbands (D-MD.). “I don’t see anything contradictory orders.”
Environment and Climate Health Researchers who receive the funding of NIH They are already afraid The Trump Administration is directing his subsidies. Many NIH CLIMATE Related Research Subsidies Examine the health effects of climate change, like heat-related diseases, the effects of colors and the effects of excluded communities.
NIH Cancellation of the scientific integrity policy “puts all the risks that are endangered,” Jennifer Jones said in the Directors of Science and Scientists.
Only last week, he said, HHS cut 10,000 employees and compelled the official vaccination of the top of the food and drug administration. In his resignation letter, Dr. Peter Marks Robert F. Kennedy Jr. inserted it. Meatles continues to spread in the country.
“It has become clear that true and transparency is not the Secretary wants, but he wants confirmation of his misinformation and lying,” Mark wrote.
Marks “The scientific output policy emphasizes the agencies of the HHS, Jones said that Jones, NIHKO staff may report allegations of political interference to integration officials within their agency.
“To protect scientists who remain in the agency to protect and finance scientists who protect and protect the conspiracy thinking administration,” he said.
Re-print E & E News Politico, with LLC’s permission. Copyright 2025. E & E News provides key news for energy and environmental professionals.