The rule of law stipulates that there are rules that provide consistent, repetitive and well -known set of results. This is not the case.
US President Donald Trump goes to the South White House lawn after arriving at the Maritime Infantry in Washington.
(Bonnie Cash / Upi / Bloomberg via Getty Images)
This year IDID does not write the “end of the term” of the Supreme Court because … what’s the point? The intellectual implementation of the proceedings of how conservative supermage flexes and violates the legal principles to achieve the republican program, feels unimportant when thinking against the refusal of the court in applying any legal standards to Donald Trump or its administration. Complaining about the Supreme Court’s decision in this case or that in this case is felt as a guy on Titanic A complaint of the song from the band.
The rule of law stipulates that there are rules. These rules must ensure consistent, repetitive and, most importantly, knowledge. Predictability is a key feature of the system based on the functioning because people need to know the rules-and the consequences of their violation-first than they act. The difference between life in accordance with the rule or law and life from the crazy is that the rights, duties, prohibitions and privileges of your situation do not change radically every time a person in power throws wider.
But the Supreme Court decided that the rules and laws are not applied by Trump and they don’t protect anyone by Trump. This means that this country has died in this country (which should not be completely strange, given that this country almost never respects the rule of law in other countries). No one can know if they will be the rights they have today. No one can know if today the government that is not illegal to them will be illegal to make them tomorrow.
We see the truth about the origin of this country in lawlessness every day. All you have to do is pick up the newspaper, turn on the TV or go to Trump’s account in social media. Almost every “News” story you see is in one of two categories: Trump has done something or Trump threatens to do something. No one can say securely whether these actions or threats are “legitimate” because everyone knows (whether they admit that you do not) that the rules and laws no longer apply to Trump’s regime.
That’s why follow the news Feel The way it does now. People love predictability. This is harsh in our form. But Trump can threaten anything, literally, and no one can know whether it can be stopped. Regardless of whether Trump’s policy is more about how serious Trump is about doing this policy, not whether any rules or structures that prevent this policy exist.
I am a terrible “law” expert and I can no longer tell you whether the last thought is from Trump’s “Constitutional”. Anyone who claims to be just lying to you at that moment. Maybe I can tell you how the Supreme Court will do everything Trump wants to do legal. What I can’t tell you it will happen if the court said Trump “No”. Will such a ruling stop it? Will he ignore him? Now there is no much evidence that Trump will stop the adverse ruling of the Supreme Court. On the contrary, there is a mountain of evidence that Trump would ignore the decision he did not like: a new study showed that Trump administration did not succumb Each of the three court orders.
Current Issue
When it comes to the rule of law, two of the three are really very bad. You do not live in a legal society if the laws apply only two in three times. The rule that works only 66 percent of the time is not the law, but the proposal. The fact that Trump is fulfilling the law sometimesBut not at other times, it means that laws are important only if Trump thinks he needs.
I can imagine that some people claim that the fact that the president is working under the boundaries of the rule of law does not mean that the rule of law is dead. These people would be mistaken: the rule of law exists as opposed to one person’s rule. If the president can change the rules at will, and is not subjected to the consequence for violation of the law, then the rule of the law does not function functionally.
I am not naive: I know well that rich and powerful usually act by the rules and laws when they apply to most ordinary people. What makes Trump administration unique (in the American context) is what lawlessness is not just address him personally; This is concerned any A person official or an institution on which he benefits. The Secretary of the Internal Security, Kirti NOM, acts under the borders of the rule of law while what she does is pleasing to Trump. Elon Musk acted under the boundaries of the rule of law until he was dissatisfied with Trump. The ice seems to have power to abduct people and cruel citizens, unprepared and even elected officials who hinder their paths. And thanks to the ubiquitous pardons, which Trump gave his associates and cult followers who attacked the Capitol on January 6, any barbecue, dissolved barbecue in the cap, can also act beyond the rule of law while they do what Trump wants them to do.
We see this in the news all the time. This is Alina Habba allowed to be US Prosecutor on New Jersey? Based on the rule of law, no, of course, not. Based on Trump’s power, who can know? Can RFK Jr. make measles again big again? Can Lee Zeldin cancel the act of clean air? Can Pete Hegseth Garstone Bombing Operations Through the Signal? Can Sean Duff run NASA? Answer all these questions – “Can?” Because, whether Trump or anyone in his administration may not be done or not based on any rule or law that regulates the case.
The analogy I often used to explain our current legal system goes from the first Pirates of the Caribbean The film. I’m very serious. There is a brilliant little scene on which Captain Jack Sparrow tries to explain the law of the open sea naive Will Turner. Says Sparrow“The only rules that really matter are what a person can do and what a person cannot do.” He explains that he tin Kill Turner right there on the spot but what he legs Bring the ship they are in the port. The impossibility of the sparrow to do what he wants is the only thing that prevents him from doing what he wants to do now.
Pirate ship is not democracy; This is a dictatorship. It is also the current American ship of the state. The only thing that holds back what Trump does today is what he wants to do tomorrow. The only people and institutions that allow you to work are those who need to help it achieve their future goals. And the rules and laws do not exist to limit Trump, his officials or his supporters; They exist to limit people and forces opposed to Trump.
Again, if you don’t believe me, just pick the paper. Specify that you are sure Trump is forbidden to do and tell me who you imagine to stop it. You will soon realize that what we press is no – this is not the rule of law. What we hope for is a rebellion.
More than Nation
Trump’s popularity in Freefall, 2026 should become an affiliation for the opposition. But there are signs that Dems can sleep in a disaster.
Trump’s bizarre statement that he had fallen with the accused of children, because Epstein “stole” workers from Mar-a-lago only raises more fierce questions.
The Democratic Party, obsessed with death, remains as unpopular as never, but there is another way.
House care workers spoke with the nation about their fear of expanding ICE and losing and health care in the shameful law.
Wisconsin’s governor was in good condition to win a third term. Instead, he cleaned the way to the new generation of Democrats. Others must take note.
