A Supreme Court Tuesday, Oklahoma commanded a man who was convicted of murder, Richard Glossip – He has been scheduled to perform nine times and served his “last lunch” three times. Now he must receive a new test because the fiscal mistakes violated its constitutional rights.
5-3 decisions marks an extraordinary shift in a case seen by decades of failed appeals, which first questioned gloryipa to face not to face the Supreme Court Constitutionality of deadly injection as cruel and unusual punishment.
“We concluded that the prosecution has violated its constitutional duty” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in most of his opinions, 14. Proclaiming the right to obtain the correction process. “Then we reverse trial and change the case for a new judgment.”
John Roberts and Elena Kabanaugh and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined John Roberts and Jotice. Justice Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett. Justice Neil Gorsuch regained the case as a claim judge due to previous implication.
View of the Supreme Court of Washington, 19 July 2024.
Kevin Mohatt / Reuters
Glossip Oklahoma The jury convicted 1997 kills, the Motel of Barry Van Barry van, only testimonials by Justin Sned, when he made a claim to carry out murder. He has maintained his innocence. There was no physical evidence.
SELAXA – Life received a sentence when exchanging testimonies against Glossip – he was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and took psychiatric medication, but he denied it during the test – the facts that the prosecutors who knew the truth.
“He directed the prosecution standing at the stand, he would suffer his credibility,” Sotomayor wrote. “That correction would be considered reliable … However, the Swede could lie under the science. Anyone like this would be significant in any case, and above all, no one was the idea of a strong witness.”
Drummond General Government of Drummond, General Drummond, was carried out after reviewing the true record.
“The death penalty does not activate, you know, ideology or politics,” Drummond said Abc News last year. “The rule of law should be activated. This has been a wild position to take me, but it is what needs to be done.”
Drummond said it does not think that gloryip is innocent, but a new judgment is essential.
“We thank the majority of the courts, whether the critical evidence of defensive lawyers cannot be lied to the jury. The current victory was the victory of justice and fairness in our judicial system.” Gloss- Lawyers in Don Knight in a statement. “The rich glossip that has maintained his innocence for 27 years will allow you to be a fair trial that has always denied”.
This photo given by the Oklahoma Correction Department shows Richard Richard’s death row on 19 February 2021.
Department of Directing Oklahoma AP
The family of Van Trees asked the Supreme Court to leave the conviction of the gloryip.
Thomas Justice, written assignment, said that the High Court did not authorize the Court of the State of Oklahoma, which refused to give a new trial.
“The court focuses on the law to promise its favor,” said Thomas. “It is a violation of the process based on the testimony of the state of the witnesses. And for the remedy, he promises a new trial by violating the black power judgments of the court.”
