Russia’s war against Ukraine is hardly sticking. The prospect of agreeing on the ceasefire, which appeared a few weeks ago, for example, becomes distant and blurry.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is located in Russia in Russia in Russia in 2017 in the Pole camp in Alexandra Land Island. Photo: Mikhail Svetlov / Getty Images
Russian President Vladimir Putin is not postponed or continues in an unavailable circumstances when accepting concessions, not a deal (Re: RussiaMarch 27).
From the Black Sea to the Arctic
An uncompromising position, by reducing the Black Sea military operations, caused little progress from the US-Russian-Ukrainian talks in Saudi Arabia (Carnegie PolicyMarch 27). Ukraine consistently demands more concessions when Russia refuses to lose missile strikes of Moscow, Moscow, Moscow, Moscow, because of attacking the fence tankers of “shadow fleet E milkOpen Novaya Gazeta EuropeMarch 28). At the end of the week, Putin focused the attention of the free maneuver from the Black Sea to the Arctic.
The International Arctic Forum held in Murmansk on March 27, the “Arctic: Dialogue Territory” previously served as a meeting for international stakeholders, but now it was reduced to a podium for Putin’s rhetoric (see PanoramaMarch 21; IzvestiaMarch 28). Russia is excluded from international cooperation formats and gives several benefits to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). As a result, Putin took a rare because the model is unemployed for the development of the northern sea route (KommersantMarch 27). The production of natural gas production is signed and Gazprom has not mentioned the market value (Lenta.ruOpen RBCMarch 28). In Putin’s mind, these economic failures are important importance compared to the main source of Russia’s power in the Arctic.
Northern fleet
Putin’s visit was the beginning of a newly established nuclear submarine Permarmed with hypersonic Vernacon missiles (Topwar.ruMarch 27). This missile was designed as an anti-ship weapon for various naval platforms, but Putin described it as a strategic weapon system (InterfaxMarch 27). His usual bragging has been interested in continuing conversations about the United States, which is rejected to the United States since Moscow’s battle against Ukraine has been in accordance with the atmosphere (The club of the ValdaMarch 18). Kremlin, US President Donald Trump’s views to reduce its nuclear arsenals, but Moscow and Washington, as equal to the strategic nuclear issues, are eager to open the communication channel (RiacFebruary 12; Mk.ruMarch 3).
To attract Trump
This traditionally, the main channel can be part of a broader dialogue related to Russia-US cooperation, which was trying to attract Trump to the end of Putin against the war against Ukraine (Nezavisimaya GazetaMarch 23). In the Arctic, joint ventures are proposed as a profitable opportunity, even if Russia does not exercise complete control over such projects, it is significantly higher for potential PRC investors (Knowledge of knowledgeMarch 27). Putin said Trump’s plans to control the Greenland as “serious” and said that Russia did not object to such sovereign rights in the arctic (RBCMarch 27). This hypothetical proposal is a clear increase in tensions between the United States and Denmark, which is the potential to deepen the nationis depth in the North Atlantic Agreement (NATO). E milkJanuary 21; Svoboda.orgMarch 12; InterfaxMarch 28).
Pressure to Northern Europe
It is put pressure on northern European countries fighting a demarpe against the “militarization” of the Norwegian “militarization” against the “militarization” of the archipelague “Militarization” of the archipelague of the archipelago of the archipelague to deepen this tension E milkMarch 20; 24tv.uaMarch 26). Nordic states along with the Baltics, but the strongest supporters of Ukraine’s collective defense and supporters strengthen only the threats for Finland and Sweden (Fontanka.ruMarch 27). Moscow is not like Ukraine’s net buyer, but it is not like a significant contribution, it is excited with European plans for the reconstruction of military power and defense industry.Topwar.ruMarch 27). Russia designs for the division of the Trans-Atlantic Union always assumed that Europe’s U.S. security liabilities were reduced and distributed. Now it is supported by a European reparation of Europe, which is re-enabled by Nordic-Baltic to prevent Russian ambitions, is supported by collective leadership provided by Germany, France and the United Kingdom (Nezavisimaya GazetaMarch 26).
The Kremlin describes the dynamics as threatened Russia’s security and insists that the break in the fighting in the war. Putin, so that the North Fleet’s Underwater Ships “Peace Deal” “KommersantMarch 28). The plan of the war is aimed at defeating Ukraine, even if Russia’s ruthless attacks reduce territorial profits (InsiderMarch 29). In Russian society, on the contrary, it hopes to increase the rise in increasing the war and prosperous landscapes (see E milkJanuary 13; Re: RussiaMarch 28). In the economy, consumer confidence increased, despite the reduction of inflation oil revenues, the defense industry has exhausted growth potential (Moscow timesMarch 28). The relaxation of the sanctions is the main focus of Moscow’s optimistic expectations, but sober sound warns of numerous obstacles in the way to restore economic normality modicum in Russia (Forbes.ruMarch 28).
Excuse to get ready to end the war
Excuse for Putin’s preparation to end the war is rejected by its own mongering rhetoric (see) E milkFebruary 3). The Kremlin is trying to promote this subtle Russian-US-US-US-US-US-US-US-US-US-US-US-US-US capital and economic roads, including the Arctic. This is the problem of this intrigue that the failure to stop fatal military operations, the profit from an unknown arctic cooperation is hypothetical and mainly fabrications.
Russia has suffered great and sustainable concentration and Arctic development plans to defend the charm war of economic and human resources against Ukraine. The launch of new nuclear submarines is not to solve the problems of infrastructure worsening even on military bases. The indifference of environmental problems, including environmental problems resulting in the nucleus of the Arctic, creates risks that all geopolitical fantasies will fall inevitably) (see) E milkMarch 4).
