Manchester City threw a new legal challenge against the new rules of the Premier League.
Premier League Champions Lawyers have contacted Premier League officials on the rules of the party’s transactions in search of another arbitration hearings.
APT rules regulate trading transactions, which have entered their owners’ clubs and companies that require to be a “fair market value.”
Contradictory rules aim to prevent the richest clubs for the inflow and players more on the influx of such transactions to remain competitive.
It turns out that “Manchester City is not happy with the changes” and it is understood that they will consider the rules as anti-competitive.
In November, the English champions lost when most of the top flight clubs voted in favor of changes in the ANC rules, which were a legal challenge in June last year. The city considered rules to be part of the “tyranny of the majority”.
Both sides won in October last year after the Arbitration Committee found that some elements of some of the League APT rules were illegal.
Premier League asked clubs to vote on changes that the rules are legal and comply with the legislation of the UK competition. This included a fair market value (FMV) to provide a fair market value (FMV), removing some changes to APT rules and changes how clubs entered the League database used to make FMV decisions.
Both sides won in October last year after the Arbitration Committee found that some elements of some of the League APT rules were illegal.
But the Premier League provided the minimum of 14 votes that needed from member clubs to make changes, the city, Aston Villa, Newcla and Nottingham forest He realized that they voted against them.
Richard Master, CEO of Premier League, wrote a letter to the Premier League clubs, informing them about the latest legal actions of “Manchester City”. The letter was sent in the afternoon yesterday.
In the letter, the masters say: For this purpose, they agreed that the same tribunal should be appointed to listen to the new case.
“The parties are currently in line with further directions. He added: “APT rules remain full of strength, and clubs remain all parties in the system.
