How Long Before Taking Tylenol While Pregnant Is a Crime?

Accompanied by Donald Trump’s press conference last week on the alleged connection between Tilenol and Autism was Fict On the White House website called “Data testifies to the connection between acetaminophen, autism”. Starts with the quote by the press secretary Carolyn Levit: “The Trump administration does not believe that there is more pill to jump out to the best health.”

With a widely critical press conference, medical associations and Group of Autism Propaganda opposed the unjustified claims of the president. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) noted that the most reliable studies did not show a significant connection between the use of Tylanol and autism and that the White House undermines one of the few drugs that can be used to treat “pain and fever” during pregnancy. Autism self -defense has called on leaders to justify their recommendations in evidence and take actions that “significantly improve” the lives of autists and their families.

Despite the shocking, the proclamation is a representative of the repertoire of the administration on the issues related to the reproduction: misinformation of pigs, humiliation of women and blame women. In the context of new data on increasing harassment for related Rimes since the US Supreme Court canceled Rooe v. WadeThis president’s instruction must concern all of us.

Despite its central independently, pregnancy is not well studied in science and medicine. The long -standing (and sometimes necessary) exceptions of women in clinical trials, especially where there may be a risk to the fetus, caused gaps in the fact that we know about pregnancy and fetal health.

Those who suffer the most from this lack of information are pregnant people who cannot overcome what they should or should not do in everyday life when they are brought out. Controversial research if there is at all and misinformation Complete the void that makes it difficult for people to move on even the main issues of everyday life, from how much coffee to how much exercise is too much. A serious health problem can even complicate this, especially in the states when pregnancy criminalizes, causing pregnant women’s decisions about how much to suffer before seeking medical intervention.

Federal agencies, including CDCs, often give recommendations for interpretation of pregnancy information, but today these groups seem to be more concerned that they sow doubts that the administration benefits politically than the promotion of the best practices that would improve the health of mothers and babies.

Rising sustainable ideas about acetaminofen safety during pregnancy, the administration has strengthened the idea that the suffering of women – which we have seen from the time Oak The solution is not what you need to worry about. In recent years, women have been denied septiclost the fallopian tubes and the ability to tolerate future pregnancies and died. It seems that there is no number of suffering to turn the head of legislators and leaders against the choice of consequences in the state actions on pregnant women. Instead, anecdotes of female suffering seems to have the opposite effect than the intended.

If not a pregnant person, who should we take care of? Answer loud: above life, bodies, organs or welfare, most important essence A future babyRegardless of the stage of embryonic or fetal development. It undermines the idea that pregnant women should also have Right to life.

Finally, the administration is guilty. Are women “jumping pills”? The phrase involves irresponsible use of medicines during pregnancy.

As for the calls of researchers and doctors, to study the complex manifestations of autism, to acknowledge the displacement of autism, as well as to recognize various factors and, despite requests for resources from lawyers, the Trump administration determined the guilt of parties in the increase in autism: mother, acetamine and, by association, doctors who advise women.

This may have several effects. For the first time, the willingness to pursue the mother for their allegedly bad behavior during pregnancy is growing. It rests on a long story: Even if there was a major right to abortion, women were prosecuted Actions taken during pregnancy. These persecutions often impeded more sustainable efforts to intervene and help mothers and infants whose behavior can result in poverty or lack of access to help. Persecution continued with greater force since Oak: A New Pregnancy Righteration Report shows that more than 400 people were prosecuted for pregnancy, childbirth and pregnancy losses in the first two years after the decision.

Given the suffering of women in pregnancy on the back vodka and guilt and accountability, which occupies the central scene, we must be wary of how pregnancy directives in the criminal legal system will be mobilized.

Secondly, doctors who are afraid to blame autism because of medical interventions, like acetaminophen, can stop recommending it for use in border cases. This can have a perverted effect from scaring women from access to the need for treatment during pregnancy, which causes the woman to suffer, and actually exposing the baby. Are doctors shy to suggest Tylanol? Cases of doctors acting Fear of the trialto the detriment of the pregnant woman was good discussed and documented. If so, pregnant women will suffer, while the administration exceeds the relationship between acetinophen and autism and the medical facility seeks to protect themselves from responsibility.

Certainly, there is nothing fundamentally bad about HHS devoted to more resources in understanding how drugs can affect the health, health of the fetus or health of the future population. The important thing is that we do this in such a way that determines the care priorities, deampases the guilt and relies on the best available evidence.