Choosing Empathy Is Critical to Democracy

Choosing empathy is central to democracy

Who C. Daryl Cameron

In the weeks before and after the US presidential election, many of us are wondering about our role empathy in the year American politics. Does it matter whether candidates care about their constituents, and what a person’s vote says about them the ability or willingness to empathize with others?

Empathy is important to democracy, but it is complicated to understand, as scientists and philosophers have done he tried to learn in practice for a long time. I am one of those scientists. As we use in our country daily liveswe often mean sharing the emotions of others, such as feeling someone else’s sorrow or joy, but it can also mean showing compassion or concern for their suffering or understanding, and believing their pain or joy.

As for the November election, how much empathy mattered? And in a challenging, exhausting and polarized political environment, how do we remain empathetic? Do we even need it? Here, I am saying that we must remember our responsibility to choose and control the extent of our empathy, and that we can do so by reflecting. why do we care and engaged inwhether it is to maintain our values, to feel good or to know the world better. As in my research the laboratory and in mine the field has shown, malice is a decision; we are the authors of our own empathy, and numbness is not an accidental consequence.

About supporting science journalism

If you like this article, please consider supporting our award-winning journalism subscribing. By purchasing a subscription, you’re helping to ensure a future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas that shape our world.

I think showing empathy a selection. We need to be mindful of the social pressures that can steer these choices in certain directions if we don’t make an effort to manage our empathy ourselves. It may be important to extend empathy across political divides, but also to maintain motivations to empathize with the marginalized, especially if they are targeted by other political groups. The common area may run the risk of diminishing such things damages.

For me, empathy is a strength, not a weakness, a way of caring for the people we care about most. If we allow ourselves to become uncomfortable with the needs of others, we risk losing sight of democracy and the importance of treating each other with dignity. Especially in the current climate, we should redouble our desire to empathize, and remember the will to empathize the ability to do so may be just as important. Effort matters.

Exit surveys tell us that having empathetic leaders may not be that important to many voters. Of the four characteristics attributed to the candidates in the 2024 US presidential election, only 18 percent ranked empathy (“he cares about people like me”) as most important. Perhaps surprisingly, this is consistent the findings that people value leaders who care impartially and who show it schadenfreude and enjoy pain in political opponents. Of that 18 percent who prioritized empathy, only a quarter supported Trump. However, the pressing question may not be for whom empathy mattered most, as our research has shown that voters can overestimate partisan differences worried

What matters more is how we uphold the will to empathize as a value and social norm. How do we avoid numbness, like The New Yorker cartoons isolation as self-care?

Before politics comes into play, we know that people find empathy tiring and effortful. My team has usually found those people choose to avoid empathy with strangers, considering it taxable. If empathy is like complex math, people may take the easy way out and avoid the problem set. But what matters is who those feelings are about, as people choose empathy and mercy more for close others. When adding political dynamics – for example, what political opponents or what peers think about our empathy; the calculation of empathy may be even more challenging.

After the elections, there has been an increase in harassment black people and girls and women. Events like these suggest that we must keep in mind that we are not normal counter-empathy, especially for marginalized populations. Others suggest empathizing working class the votersand learn about those who will feel like they won’t be heard anymore. the rules it can shape the way we think empathy. For example, when they are parents prove it who deserves their empathy, children often follow. People motivated to empathize with marginalized communities should reflect on and defend these values.

Finally, the election results ask whether people should empathize across party lines. Again, motivations matter. When people think cross-partisan empathy is useful for political conversation, it shows reduce hostility and increase support for democracy. However, people would find it suitable empathize with others who express counter-empathy in return? Such empathy seems dangerous in a world with a lot of schadenfreude. take it Daily Wire TikTok “liberal tears”, or an unconfirmed onebut viral reddit the message (Over 48,000 votes on “Leopards Ate My Face” Reddit forum) About what Trump supporters learn about possible negative consequences of their vote. People can learn effects of empathy, and if they are punished instead of rewarded, they may back off.

So how do we maintain empathy in the face of exhausting headwinds? First of all, we can remind ourselves of the prosocial power of continuing to practice empathy – especially for the weakest. shared misfortune. shared the experiences can build common ground. But it’s important not to forget that finding common ground across partisan lines can obscure real differences of opinion in how marginalized groups are perceived and treated. Encouraging cross-party empathy should not imply that different political groups express their values ​​in the same way.

Another point is that empathy and compassion can refresh what we value. Compassion and relatable to those in need cause anger and punishment in their name Moral indignation, on the other hand, can accept it collective action to help those in need, and people bow down moral outrage when their commitments are clearly defined. Being able to harness anger wisely can be key political commitment and democratic the conversation. Strategically managing empathy can facilitate anger and citizen engagement (e.g., after Roe v. Wade it flipped over). By reminding ourselves why we care to begin with, we can commit to sustainable options rather than growing enthusiastic.

This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author(s) are not necessarily their own. American scientific