As the occurrence of Texas, EPA sciences will be ignored, will have pollution and cancer to the festier
Trump Administration intends to destroy EPA science in the air we breathe and the water we drink more polluted
Cows graze near Roberts Nature’s Oak Center, Texas, Texas, EPA (Depending on the environmental protection agency and mercury pollution, according to the Biden Administration.
Brandon Bell / Getty Images
I have given my scientific career to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency asking for the implementation of public health protections from toxic chemicals. I don’t always agree with the final decisions of the EPA, but I respect the scientific process and I always appreciate the agency scientists. Confidence in our public brain.
In one of them The most dangerous actions Against facts and science, the Trump Administration announced In March That the EPA will shut off the independent research office. This will cut the agency more than 1,000 scientists and technical experts, such as determining a chemical position The risk of canceror is a factory Polluting the surrounding river. At the same time, Trump’s EPA has installed the former oil and chemical Industry lobbyes write rules for regulating these industries.
There is a lot of empty talk To stay healthy It will come This administration. Future generations will be even worse.
To help Science Journalism
If you enjoy this article, consider entering award-winning journalism Subscribe. By purchasing subscription, you are helping to ensure the future of stories about the discoveries and ideas that are conformed to today.
What is left without saying Trump EPA is said: Emissive scientists have environmental protections. Each major environmental statuteClean air action, Safe action of drinking water and Superfund Law Government Cleaning Requirements: EPA scientists believe that dangerous chemicals are like, how people and fauna can be seen and what health and ecological damage can occur. Are environmental and community protections, such as: exposure to this chemical exposure in my workplace will increase the risk of breast cancer? Is the quality of the air of electricity emissions for the surrounding community? What is PFA acceptable standard for the eternal chemicals in our drinking water?
Sugar Bank Mercury Me’s Superfund site drone view at Clearlake Oaks, California on January 30, 2024 on Tuesday.
Jane Tyska / Digital First Media / East Bay Times Getty Images
Instead, the Trump Group again swings its motos, this time against the independent science of pollutants. As a result, the adoption of scientific research and decimal academic research, the only type of scientific research will be available to implement environmental standards: implementation of pollutants. And that’s the trouble. The public has the right to distrust the science protected by contaminants; See the “tobacco science” and the myth of the initial nuclear waste.
Ask Texas. Texas state Vigorous defense Ethyl oxides, a well-known carcinogene, endangering the public health of science by a pollutant pollutant industry. and Folding hell in hell in hell to rewrite scientific events about a chemical cancer.
In 2016, he studied and after study, the EPA determined ethylene oxide, a chemical product that is widely used in the Texas and Louisiana facilities to sterilize medical equipment Related to cancer-Not has been found more than 30 times higher than the EPA. New EPA risk assessment has ended the study 300 Breast Cancer Added cases of women who work with chemistry and add the risks that children can withstand.
EPA’s inform After multiple internal reviews, reviews of other government agencies, including public entries, in many Texas and industries. The Agency Science Advisory Committee also made two rounds.
Rather than finding, the regulatory agencies of chemical industry and Texas gave theirs Alternative report In 2020 ethylene oxide. With the evaluation of the EPA in a sharp contrast, Texas evaluation A Contractor’s product Protected Ethylene oxide industryy Public review limited. It Fails They would allow the risk of breast cancer and emit more than 3,000 times, which would significantly increase diseases and deaths, including employees and the surrounding communities.
To adopt calculations of Texas cancer risks, Texas revised the discoveries of national science, engineering and medicine in the US, national confidence and health consulting sources.
In March, he gave national academies Last ReportBouncing the basics of Texas analysis, repeatedly diverted from the best scientific practices and failed to offer a “compelling basis” for findings, specifically that his determination was not associated with breast cancer.
Rewriting the history of Texas Cancer, ethylene oxide, as an acceptable non-acceptable chemical agreement, is just the beginning of non-Maymema’s start and misinformation, to protect the economic interests of Maymi and non-misinformation without misinformation.
It eliminates cancer evidence due to fudging data and wild claims, it will become true, underestimate the environmental law and underresting the regulation of the nation and jeopardize our right to health.
We will all suffer.
This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views indicated by the author or authors are not necessarily American scientific.
