Federal Judge appointed Trump, rejected a bizarre attempt to deprive voters after They threw ballots.
On Monday, April 14, 2025, the Democratic Associated Justice of Alison Riggs talked to the rally participants at the rally as North Carolina.
(Master Seminrara / AP)
Republicans missing In November in the Supreme Court of North Carolina in the Supreme Court of North Carolina in November in November. But the race was close, and therefore, in the great tradition, which refuses Donald Trump, Jefferson Griffin, the defeated candidate for the republican court, refused to concede. Instead, Griffin launched that mentioned As “unprecedented efforts to change election results across the country.” These efforts initially included an attempt to challenge as much as 65,000 legally discard the ballots, into the brazen hugs after the election of imprisonment as an electoral strategy. Gambit North Carolina GoP rose to extensive concern at the national levelAccording to the Republicans, under the influence of Trump’s assistants and the president, who demonstrated the strengthening of disregard for democratic norms, were ready to participate in larger attempts to abandon the will of the people.
But on Monday, a federal lawyer appointed Trump, US Chief District Richard Ernest Maers II, crushed the North Carolina’s initiative with the decree that this is a decree on that Absolutely rejected Schemes GoP “Change the Rules of the Game After Her Game”.
Efforts to cancel the election Supreme Court Elison RiggsThe democratic appointment, who narrowly won the full eight-year term in the North Carolina court in November, received further than ever, because the Republican majority in this Supreme Court accepted the efforts of Griffin to challenge the foreign newsletters with historically democratic counties.
Griffin and his court allies hoped to throw away enough ballots to remake the victory of the 734th Rigg justice. The scheme attracted reproaches from the North Carolina election experts and across the country, which admitted that Riggs was right when Riggs was right when she said“Efforts to deprive military and foreign voters in North Carolina are toxic to our democracy. They would put a precedent that the loss of candidates in any election can change the election laws to benefit them even after they lost.”
This is a broader view of the threat that a precedent from North Carolina can play in violation of court competitions and other races across the country, has fought the main focus of supporters of the voting rights. In a review of the case published in February interpret“Griffin seeks to cancel what was the Northern Star in the election legislation: you cannot change the election rules. Several judges in the Supreme Court of North Carolina, however, have been open to his claims. This is a trial of the judicial system that made the role that the courts are in support.
Judge Maers acknowledged what it is about when he interpret In his decision on Monday, the North Carolina case “concerns whether the federal constitution of the state will change the rules of the election after the fact and apply these changes to the elected group only to the selected group of voters, and because it is treated with these voters, otherwise than others located in similar persons.”
Current Issue
Identifying a judge appointed by Trump that the Constitution does not allow such abuses to settle things, ordered certify Riggs justice as a winner. Judge Maers added a rigorous reproach for election denials seeking the backward vote after they were legally discarded. “You set the rules before the game starts,” he wrote about the electoral standards. “You don’t change them after the game is done.”
Election of justice Riggs is a veteran’s civil rights lawyer who worked with a vote program in the South Social Justice Coalition before it was appointed to the Supreme Court in 2023 by the former Democrats Governor Roy Kuro – until the full term, does not change his This, however, increases the perspective that the future elections, where the Democrats will transfer, can transfer the court balance.
More importantly, the result of North Carolina defends the basic democratic values at a time when they were never more siege.
Chairman of the Democratic National Committee Ken Martin Saying hello The result of the North Carolina as a “righteous victory of democracy and the obvious defeat from the political game”, explaining, “within 200 days the Republicans in the North Carolina sought to abolish the will, steal the Supreme Court and systematically undermines the main faith in our elections. The Caroline Supreme Court.”
On your part, the righteousness of Riggs – said on Wednesday“I am honored to fight this struggle – although it should never happen – and I am delighted with the North Carolines, whose courage reminds us of everything we can use our votes to prosecute any politician who strives to take power from the hands of people.”
