Transformation Diagram for Measuring Reading Tools
from Staff
If you have used AR (accelerated reader) as a reading motivation tool to set goals and track progress, you are undoubtedly aware of its ability to evaluate the general levels of reading.
The problem is that measuring the reading level is really outside its sweet place as a literacy tool, with better resources available by DRA, Dibels, Lexile, Reading Recovery and Rigby, among others. There is also the issue of availability, with most schools using only one or two of these instruments, mainly in the early primary school. But what happens if you have to convert a total level from one program to another?
1. Lexile Framework to read
The Lexile frame is the most commonly used tool in American schools. It measures both the complexity of the text and the ability to read the student on the same scale.
Pros: Integrated into many platforms (eg growth
Cons: Do not take into account basic knowledge or interest
Best for: Class 2+, especially when used with adaptive estimates
2. Fountas & Pinnell (F&P)
This A -Z reading system uses teacher monitoring and starting records.
Pros: rich quality insight, great for small groups
Cons: It takes time and somewhat subjective
The best for: K – 5 Guide Reading programs
3. DRA (Development Reading Rate)
Pearson’s ratings
DRA provides a level of reading based on mastery, accuracy and understanding.
Pros: In -depth photos of reading behavior
Cons: Requires Individual Testing Time
Best for: K -3 diagnostic use
4. Star Reading
Renaissance training: A computer adaptive test that quickly identifies a student reading level and ZPD (proximal development zone).
Pros: Fast, scales, rich in data
Cons: Less Diagnostic Depth
The best for: comparative assessment and screening in 2-12 grades
5. Ready to read diagnostics
I-Rady.com: This adaptive test provides a personalized view of the ability to read students and links directly to the content of the instruction.
Pros: detailed reports, integrated curriculum
Cons: own system; Requires a full entry
Best for: Schools using I-Premium for all subjects
6. Reading AZ and RAZ-KIDS
These programs assign students, leveled readers and allow an ongoing assessment of reading.
Pros: a huge digital library, built -in quizzes
Cons: Equalization is not always aligned with other systems
The best for: Daily Reading and Monitoring Practice (Class K -5)
7. Informal reading descriptions (IRIS)
Varies by publisher – The review includes quality reading equipment and a major reading inventory
Pros: a teacher guided, provides a rich insight
Cons: Not Standardized, takes time
Best for: Individual Diagnosis and Instruction Based on Conference
Transformation Diagram for Measuring Reading Tools
Transformation Diagram for Measuring Reading Tools
