As President Trump, European leaders will not be able to provide Ukraine to force us to make support for us, they will not be able to provide Ukraine with weapons needed.
So far, it looks like they are right.
So-called willing coalition Support for European peoples Ukraine’s support, Mr. Trump’s Europe was clear the shoulder more Ukraine’s safety and its own burden.
This is a reason for a transaction to provide a share of future revenues on natural resources, including minerals in the Ukrainian parliament. Although the security guarantee is short, it keeps open Ability to transport American weapons and other military assistance.
“It gives us hope,” he said.
Shortly after the voting, Mr. Chernev said that Mr. Chernev has lowered the majority of Ukrainian forces in long-range missiles, artillery and above, ballistic airstrikes – the majority of the produced in the United States Kiel Institute for the world economy.
In the spring, the military assistance confirmed within the Biden administration will run out of military assistance and Mr. Trump refers to refresh it.
“He said he needed more weapons, but he has been in three years after Mr. Trump has been meeting in Rome for the last month with Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky..
The allies in Europe have collected about $ 130 billion worth of military support from military support to Ukraine since Russia occupation in 2022. The US has sent the rest.
While European leaders and investors It is predicting that weapons will be ten years to be able to collect more money, industry executives and experts will take a ten years to assemble.
“Europe is trying to replace the help we lost from the United States, but unfortunately, there is no power to do them,” Chernev said. “It takes time between decision and true assistance.”
Although Mr. Trump, in recent days, including more adaptation with Ukraine on Thursday Sanctions threats If I refused to consent to the extended ceasefire in Russia, a wider rejection for the protection of 80 years for Europe has made it to re-think of the security of allied people.
Allies will avoid Mr. Trump’s US troops and Russians like America nuclear umbrellaOutside of Europe. It is eating for what other European countries give to Ukraine, which focuses on its protection.
“They hit themselves in a binary problem to reduce themselves and provide Ukraine, and the industrial opportunities are not big enough to do both,” he said.
According to him, if Europe has the most common weapons to Ukraine, “I do not make sure that there is a moderate and will.”
And so far? “No, not as soon as possible,” Mr Savill said.
Weapons It is not just a matter of life and death for the soldiers of Ukraine. Without the appropriate supply, Ukraine may lose the area when it is forced to retreat. Mr. Trump’ın ceasefire agreement was working for the broker, would freeze the confrontation. This would allow Russia to take any place seized this time.
To be sure, the influx of weapons to Ukraine to Ukraine will continue to be dried. Germany Recently, more than 60 mine-resistant armored vehicles, about 50,000 artillery tours and airstrikes, including an Iris-T term, including cruise missiles. Some drones of England and Norway have announced as a $ 600 million security package last month, since today it came to Ukraine. Estonia sends 10,000 artillery shells.
However, the commitment to produce or acquire weapons in NATO headquarters or years in the coming years was committed to the fact that it was committed to or not immediately. Ukraine may need American weapons for a while.
Some European financial support will help the defense industry in Ukraine. Mr Chernev said that Ukraine produced about 800 companies. Ukraine could produce $ 35 billion in weapons in the coming years, but this estimated that the allies should have at least $ 14 billion. Saturday, Denmark declared On behalf of the European Union Foundation, Ukraine will send about $ 930 million in frozen Russian assets to support the defense industry.
In Ukraine, Ukraine has been a billions of drones every year, including cheap Kamikazes, Mr Savill to save the supply of artillery shells. Similarly, a western intelligence official, which closely watched the war, using the less expensive interference to produce less expensive, and less expensive interference to produce less threats, he said that the Patriot airstrike was better in rioning.
“They said more cruise missiles and more ballistic missiles and various weapons,” Mr Savill, “said, but they will be forced to fill the gap.”
