This version is more quiet, prediction and more dangerous than we all remember.
Donald Trump arrives at a meeting of the Republican Governors Association at the National Museum of buildings in Washington, Colombia District, Thursday, February 20, 2025.
(Shawn Thew / EPA / Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Spontaneous mass resistance Donald Trump’s first Muslim prohibition was perhaps the defining image of the uprising that Trump met when he came to power in 2017.
Huge crowds were passing airports across the country. Activists, lawyers and desperate families collided with CBP staff until their loved ones were admitted to the United States. The uprising was limited by a strict legal reproach of Trump’s racist court.
What is often left of this story is what happened next. A few months later, the modified version of the ban retreated back; This time the Supreme Court signed a policy. If you were not one of the people who came off from your family or did not see how your green cartoon lottery dreams about a new life in America canceled, it was easy to forget that it was even there. As long as Joe Biden canceled the ban in 2021, it was deprived, effective and operated on autopilot.
It is the form of the ban – the cunning, the prediction is a return in the second term of Trump. In fact, it is not strictly called a ban on the “Muslim” ban. Bland Executive order The White House’s applications are buried in a flurry on January 20 does not call any countries or even dictate a specific policy. No weak prose. Instead, he sends four offices to start a 60-day joint review process. The process is intended to end on March 21 with the publication of a list of countries that do not meet the standards of distribution of immigrants and thus will be subject to restrictions on the ability of their citizens to enter the US.
If all this sounds amazing, it’s because it should be. Stupid bureaucratic structures that were created only to legally justify the first ban, which now make up the main structure of the new, which promises to be amorphous and adapted to change the needs of politics. However, the intention remains the same as always: to deeply expand the power of the executive over the immigration system and to fulfill the wildest dreams of Trump’s Belaonationist lackeys, especially Stephen Miller, whose power has grown only seven years since Trump first took up the post.
The abolition of Biden’s ban was the back force. He did not kill everyone who was denied Trump and gave them the opportunity to re -view their unfair visas. Trump’s recovery is similar to reverse force. Once the list of banned countries is determined, all of those countries that have been adopted in the US from the moment of abolition of the last ban will need to undergo an uncertain form of “reassessment”, taking into account the search for possible reasons for deportation. (This provision includes people with green cards.) Checking criminal records for an already introductory person has already been done in some limited cases, but in the context that has taken in the context, the return review of the people who were the last time is a new policy.
The executive order has two additional provisions that do not determine which agency will comply with, which provisions) that are transferred to the broad and transformation power they teach.
The United States should guarantee that aliens and foreigners admitted otherwise, who are already present in the United States by other threats to our national security.
Current Issue
At this point, the Legolets must be released: this deportation policy or the bar forever from the US, who publicly acts in support of Palestine. Each group involved in armed resistance against Israeli genocide was a terrorist organization assigned to the United States. But even if your personal statements do not affect the topic of armed resistance, the US policy is to consider municipality and local gas government as an expansion of Hamas. Even a statement about the praise for, say, firefighters and rescuers from Gaza, can theoretically be a deported offense for a foreigner to the US. The owner of the green map, who married an American citizen, can be deported and constantly forbidden to reunite with her husband for placing “from the river to the sea” on Instagram.
Less personally horrific, but structurally disturbing – these are provisions for reviewing “visa programs” that allow the executive power through the revival of a Muslim ban, entrants from visa programs they do not like, but at this point cannot legally erased:
(C) Evaluate all visa programs to ensure that they are not used by foreign nation -states or other hostile subjects to harm the safety, economic, political, cultural or other national interests
The Visa Program review will clearly provide for the preservation of the American “culture” and “values”.
It should be borne in mind that the State Department is involved in accreditation of a large number of visitors to the academic exchange and doctoral studies under the category of J1. What will happen to the Fulbright program if the subjects of foreign students are excluded in the Maga values? What about doctoral studies? Is there a black story? A new ban can also in fact close certain topics of academic research for international students. Foreign employees may prove to be banned as national security threats, even if their employment conditions are quite legitimate and higher.
When the latest Muslim ban caused a deep institutional rollback. From the highest ranks in the constant current, up to the visa officers who are interviewed in the window to minimize policy damage. (I was One of them Internal opponents.) It is much less likely that this time. The external political bodies of America are afraid of their work. Internal treatment over the support of institutional diversity, justice and inclusion are already happening. Mass layoffs or worse are in the cards. Immigration officials will not be as concerned as they will try to restrain their heads. Or they will try to resist and dismiss anyway.
The more gloomy ban no longer seems terrible. The last internal disagreement in the State Department was Laser-oriented (to the subter the effect) to push away from the complicity of America in the genocide of Gaza. The Muslim ban does not look so bad for comparison, and it is little shocking. Every junior visa officer who has been banned from the prohibition has joined the State Department over the past few years in the world where the ban has already taken place. They will make their own internal transaction about how they treat this part of the work. No one who implements this policy will be able to say that it has not subscribed. They deliberately did.
Popular
“Spend on the left below to view more authors”Spend →
Normalization of the Muslim ban will also nourish its extension. This can be applied to any geopolitical essence or group, which is in the intersection of an increasingly chaotic security state. This is a ban, the provisions of which, as it is written, could be just as easily deployed against Chinese immigrants and Chinese Americans who consider nuances about their country of origin or to Promoting synophobia as a whole. See which countries end on the list of initial bans; In the countries of South and Central America, which are actively fulfilling the Trump deportation policy, they will have much more likely to avoid citizens’ ban. At first they came for Muslims, but now every diaspora is a potential trade in geopolitical rivalry. They want everyone to be a little frightened – and be able to bring maximum observation against any foreigner at any time. The provisions of the internal review of this order mean the life of immigrants in America, can be seen as one endless visa interviews.
The situation is gloomy than last time, but the creation of a tougher, more durable and more ambitious civilian resistance to this Muslim ban is possible and necessary. We have a head and time to prepare. We have broader coalitions. The prohibition goes from what is happening in isolated diplomatic positions, to what gets deep into American campuses, jobs and houses. This is a legal area where more broad problems can be established, and if a Muslim ban becomes a ban on everyone, everyone has an even greater stake in the fight against it.
We know it was before, and we know that it can be thwarted and, at worst, overcome. The Trump’s second -term executive company is also so multifaceted and outrageous that the anti -Muslim ban on the broader impetus for the inclusion of the executive power when it comes to immigration.
A small frame of administrators has made their goals. What they want now is not a trick, one-time or slogan of the company; They want this to be normalized. They want the Muslim ban to be forever. We must give them their answer to this organized, determined, lasting way.
More than Nation
He fired qualified military leaders and hired smaller people who were devoted to him. If you are wondering where everything is going: get ready for the autocracy.
The range of new firms, which was born in the Silicon Valley or incorporating its devastating Etos, began to challenge the senior for access to the Pentagon’s profitable awards.
It turns out that optimizing yourself as artificial intelligence not only does not guarantee that you live forever. It’s also very expensive.
The Lower’s political theorist presses that we have abandoned a more creative and humanistic definition of the concept.
