In a case where he sits at the intersection of his business and political interests, the president Donald Trump The Civil Litigation is trying to stop against its socially-dollar social network company, arguing that it must be immunity from the civil court of the state court, while serving as president.
Trump and its co-defendants – the main major of the main dominant of Dan Scavino staff. & Technology Group founders asked for Andy Litinsky and Wes Moss, Trump and Managers asked to avoid a scheme Getting their full participation after public in the company.
In the face of “unprecedented” civil lices, Trump argued that he had to advocate from the court that it would be “distancing” from his presidency duties and to significantly interfere with the executive branch function. “
“Without the protection of the temporary presidency, the President will be forced to defend against these cases, and for the detriment of his second terms, the person’s harm.” John Reed and theodore was presented on Friday Friday Delaware Chancery Court- in.
In December, the Judge Delaware Chancery Zurn agreed to claim that Trump could be an immune argument, Trump “is not today. Trump Media and President’s lawsuit” drainage rule “They asked for the forensic courts in the forensic courts for four years to delay the Civil Feeds.
“State courts was called to put the judgment of the President, to tax his priorities and invent its priorities. This state of the state – Jefferson’s nightmare – the court defonates the courts to control his actions,” archives said.
In his first term of office, Trump sued at least 10 times, and returned to the presidency with at least 14 courts, including several outfits related to its social networking company. Trump put it Participation in the company – 14,750,000 shares are worth more than $ 3 million – before joining this month in confidence in controlled by his son.
On October 11, 2024, File photo, a former president of the Republican presidency Donald Trump, promises farewell in a campaign in the Grand Sierra Resort of Nevada.
Justin Sullivan / Getty Images, File
If successful, the claims of the “Temporary Presidency Immune” may provide a layer of legal protection to the president after entering the office of the newly entered office after entering the office and criminal protection office The judgment of the Supreme Court Last year’s Presidential Immunity.
Defense lawyers, on the Friday archive, proclaims Trump’s “millions of electrigiies” to “destroy the President”.
“The President has already sued more than his predecessors combine, but his enemies promise that they will still come more,” the lawsuit said. “This inflatable of the Bed will have a greater threat for the operations of the executive branch and the standing courtesy of the judgment of his behavior.”
While the Supreme Court established Clinton Vn, a president has not been immunity from the courts related to personal behaviors, the lawyers carried out by Trump Media only applies to the decision in the case of federal court. The Trump Media case has not argued that he would deal with itself in his official duties, referring an example three times by President Bill Clinton. Go to war with Irake.
“With the benefits of retrospective and living experience, it is clear that the Civil Litigation Against State causes civilian lawsuit against the President and the” bullying “of the Presidency, sufficiently to obstruct the way with the operations of the enforcement branch.”
The defense lawyers say that the lawsuits had limited “energy and attention” that the presidency’s requests are announced.
“President Trump … He slept for only four to five hours. The charge of the President had his responsibilities as a leader of global business,” archives said.
In the extra archive on Friday, Trump’s personal lawyer said to the US Court to Columbia Court should be a civil claim that President January 6 Capoles Attack When he wanted to question the results of the 2020 elections because he was playing his official capacity as president.
In order to obtain comments, in Richie Jones, at the Richie Jones lawyer, he mentioned the former President of Theodore Roosevelt, saying it was the best we can do “in terms of comment.”
“No one is above the law, and no one is under that. We don’t ask anyone when we need to ask for permission,” Jones wrote.
