Climatewire | The Department of Defense has a new search and destroyed mission. It is hunting for climate-related programs and studies.
Last week, the Pentagon announced that he had abandoned several climate-related research – the warmer planets wanted to determine that they could lead to a greater instability in Africa. In addition, the Department of Defense has provided external contracts in recent weeks with all the work related to the term “climate” according to zero, according to two Pentagon officials.
Purga is driving widely driving President Donald Trump, who described the climate change as a hood. But he has taken an additional need under the guidance of the Secretary of Pete Hegseth defense, who has Long discard climate science And he is committed to eliminating all the work related to the Pentagon Climate.
To help Science Journalism
If you enjoy this article, consider entering award-winning journalism Subscribe. By purchasing subscription, you are helping to ensure the future of stories about the discoveries and ideas that are conformed to today.
” @Deptofdefense does not make climate change shit ” Hegseth wrote on x on Sunday. “We do training and war”.
There is no clear how much climate initiative is the risk of risk and how much money it would save.
Pentagon 91 research on climate and other issues said $ 30 million, but he did not rest the Department of Defense to save how much money you can save by eliminating other climate programs and studies. Pentagon officials did not seek answers on the questions about the E & E News of Political Replies. Instead, the Department of Defense “said he was working to recover from the ethos of the warriors and working our military.”
“Climate Zerootry and other Chimera on the left are not within that main mission,” John Ullyot said John Ullyot.
Defense experts have warned that these programs have no rush to cancel the Pentagon. Learning and preparing global warming is not a luxury liberal, they say – it is essential to better understand how climate change can affect global policies and the conditions of the battlefield.
“Mission and nonmissions,” said the John Conference, had dominated the dominant master of the Obama administration defense.
As an example, he expressed the risk of going to the constellation of the US military facilities worldwide.
“Climate affects military missions, it affects the ability to do your work,” the conference said, the Council’s General Advisor is about strategic risks.
“Especially with infrastructure, where you want to be able to maintain extreme weather or weather effects to maintain the ability,” he said. “But on the battlefield, you want to deal with ambient conditions and environmental conditions for your warfighting mission.”
The extensive view of the global warming of Pentagon was explained Climate Adaptation Plan The agency released last year. Climate change found that taxpayers cost dollars dollars, threatening supply chains and suspend military readiness. These impacts have the ability to comply with the training, infrastructure and defense department “to influence his mission”, reports.
“To train, fight and win more complex environments, we need to consider the effects of weather and climate change at all levels of the company,” Report found.
It has been the military strategy for years have been integrating clean energy and fuel technology in operations, largely for strategic reasons, than making greenhouse emissions.
But Trump and Hehseleth are both target that this work is vain and unnecessary. In particular, the two men have taken efforts to develop hybrid tanks; On the trail of the campaign, Trump falsely proclaimed their goal that the environmental group was.
In fact, hybrid tanks ride especially diesel and are designed to be less confident on fuel. They also offer an operational advantage because they can change the battery to a hybrid, making the heat signature that can be detected easier to detect enemies.
The army is developing an electric hybrid tank, basically the modernization of Bradley’s fighting vehicles, but they have not yet spread. The Department of Defense has been Development and dissemination browsing 2035. Hybrid hybrid vehicles a year. 2022 Climate Strategy Plans 2050. He also called to develop all electric vehicles that could be used in the year.
This plan has been deleted from the Department of Defense.
The military’s use of clean technology “The advantages of tremendous operations and abilities”, Richard Kidd, was the Secretary General of the Environment and Energy Residency in Obama Administration.
Clear energy technologies was completely part of the modern war, to support current combat spaces “electricity drones, to dispose of the edge, aimed at energy weapons and electric hybrid vehicles.”
“If the administration throws everything with the word” climate “, people, structures and contracts – they are weakening his own goals, competing with China, and accelerating the spread of nuclear power,” he said.
That said, it remains as a result of a permanent frustration with the Biden Administration, due to efforts to dispose of a wide range of military climate planning programs, including some never designed for discharges.
Push can put a target in these programs, according to Bret Strogen, as the first Secretary of Army as an assistant served as an energy and sustainability advisor in the first Trump Administration.
“Climate resilience, climate adjustment, floods, drought preparation, which is, and all others should pay attention,” he said. “Climate relief and reduction emissions is not the role of DoD.”
A defense expert warned the effort to eliminate climate programs and studies could create a blind future for pentagues.
He would leave the commitment of climate change as a multiplier threat. Some extreme storms, heat conditions and regional conflicts can damage US troops and war skills, Sherri Goodman said, deputy for defense defense subsection in the clinton administration.
He thought the allies and rivals – will completely use this scientific intelligence.
“If we put the heads in the sand, that’s the gift of China,” Goodman said, “Multiplier threat: climate, military leadership and fighting global security”.
“Climate risks are aware of their country and around the world,” he added. “And they are looking for a pure power we are creating.”
Re-print E & E News Politico, with LLC’s permission. Copyright 2025. E & E News provides key news for energy and environmental professionals.
