Despite all the confusion on its sudden movement on Tuesday, the Constitution, Federal Law and Court decisions clearly leave, Experts told ABC news: President Donald Trump Direct direct order to pause indefinitely Federal funding is illegal.
“The idea I is an idea when Article I gives Articles 1,” Michael Dorf, Constitutional Professor Law at the University of Cornell, ABC News said. “If the congress says that you spend on federal programs, that’s how much it is spent. The President cannot temporarily stopped.”
Although the Presidents of the past are attempted to establish trump directives, they have financial freezing, grants and loans and foreign support, in Steve Vladeck, Law in Georgetown Law School.
Presidents of Donald Trump, while journalists Air Force Air Force make Las Vegas, Nevada, Miami, Florida, from 25 January 2025.
Leah Millis / Reuters
Despite the influence of Trump, despite the support of most of its policies, experts have warned that his orders have not been in any land, and showed history that the rugged contempt of legislative power has been constantly overridden.
“It’s a question when, if not, if this block flips the courts,” Vladeck said ABC News.
The executive power of the federal expenditure reached the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1970s, when President Richard Nixon ordered the Environmental Protection Agency must not be funded for programs, including water treatment. The Supreme Court governed the train in 1975. The city of New York, the Lehendakari did not have strength to repeal the conference.
Dorf said in 1974 discussions on the conference of the movement. He surpassed the law control law and it was more difficult to try to stop spending the money assigned by a President.
“Congress passed this statue if the President wants to spend money, if you want to spend money at the conference,” Dorf explains. “It may ask the conference, but there are 45-day clock and a bunch of procedures, and one of them is not followed by Trump.”
The US flag flies across the Western Employed by the US Capitol Building on the second presidency of Donald Trumpen, January 20, 2025, was inaugurated.
Fabrizio Bensch / Reuters
Trump’s decree was reasoned on Tuesday. On Tuesday, he mentioned reasoned afternoon, claimed by the Office of Management and White Budget. Pre-President Order and “Advanced Marxist Heritage, TransSery and Green Social Engineering Policies.”
The application was made on behalf of the OMB actor.
There have been several challenges for the event and the Executive Impoundation, the Case Clinton v Case of the Supreme Court of the 1998. The city of New York, Clinton turned off using a line item to reduce financing, decided by the judges established by the courts.
VLADECK said the extensive and vague conditions used to “close faucets”, which violate the background established by the courts and those who violate legal languages.
“It is likely that the case is not temporary imposition,” Vladeck said about Trump Legal Group. “However, imposition activities prohibit rigor in funding.”
Experts said that Trump has made the right wings that have been telegraphed by 2025 using similar financing tactics, but they asked whether these questions were legally thought.
“In the first Trump Administration, such a citizenship question, such as the census or Daca, said Dorf. Maybe it may not be consulted and has decided to say that what you can and see what you can and see what you can that can be. “
President Donald Trump has signed many executive demands on the first day of the Washington White office, 20 January 20, 2025.
Jim Lo Scalzo / Pool / Epa-Efe / Shutterstock
Experts said the courts soon and quickly sent it to the legal cases presented against the application for Tuesday.
VLADECK said he was not surprised when he went to the Supreme Court and the court would be sure that the President would invalidate.
The last May, the court indicated He ran 7-2 In a case confirmed by the consumer financial protection office and the Congress decided to finance the agency, despite the great support of conservatives who want to defend the agency.
“I know people are quite blocked by the Supreme Court, but I don’t expect this that this is the case that divides justice in half,” he said.
Vladeck warned that this case was working on courts, due to the uncertainty left by millions of people.
Many organizations, non-profit and local governments have no idea that school meals, Medicaid and public confusion, said. Although funding is soon restored, it has been a great success in public, according to Vladeck.
“On a scale of 1 to 10, this is 13. This is not just money,” he said.
