It may not be only obvious for those who connect with more concerns, but cosmologists are tilted when unlocking the deepest secrets of the universe, no problem remains at night. The “dark matter” is an abbreviated explanation of stars and galaxies, moving much faster than the gravits of their bright issues. Let us not forget the “dark energy”, the mystery of the preferred universe spreads faster than anyone expected and accelerates. Meanwhile, “evolving” the form of dark energy can solve something that calls hubble tension.
Cosmologists have lost a sleep for such a generation generation, they ask the components that need to add their models to solve the seemingly understandable gaps. But, what is the answer to these problems, if these problems are not even radical theory, was almost a century ago since Albert Einstein himself has created? Teleparallel is called gravity, and according to a loose theoretical collection that learner, this theory is worth a closer look with a wider scientific community.
Dark, dark energy, hubble energy, stressing these theories is the general theory of Einstein’s relativity, which treats space and time “Spacetime” and gravity as a curvature of Spacetime. Perhaps the response is to change, change or update relativity, to achieve a new understanding of gravity than mysterious darkness and dark forces. But over the decades, the theorists who make this general approach have given mixed results the best.
To help Science Journalism
If you enjoy this article, consider entering award-winning journalism Subscribe. By purchasing subscription, you are helping to ensure the future of stories about the discoveries and ideas that are conformed to today.
The best example can be changed in Newtonian Dynamics (Mond), that’s the effort to scare away the dark matter, According to some researchmust still be permission several dark matter. Recently duplication “Timescape” cosmologyIt is meant to express dark energy in cosmos, saying that “giants” matter is much larger than most other measurements. None of these possible solutions without their problems.
So if these new ideas don’t work, why not return to the old master? In 1928, a decade was completed after completing the largest scientific achievement, overall relativity, Einstein began to work on an alternative form of this elegant idea. His dream was to find only one set of equations to describe gravity and electromagnetism. James Clerk Maxwell managed a feat in the early 1860s, using the only set of equations to describe electricity, magnetism and radiation and expected Einstein in Maxwell’s steps.
The curvature is the basic concept of general relativity. Matter and Energy Tell Tacetime How to bend, curve and bend. It also says how to move the spacetime. Einstein was able to use this mathematical language to describe gravity, as it was a great success on its own, but it was not enough for him. Theory could not even describe the electromagnetic force. So he returned to another view that offered greater flexibility: the torsium. The “teleparalel” version of gravity, materiality and energy “is told spacetime in this version twistand and twists to cause the swims outside to the other.
Einstein hope that this new concept could lead to the same theory of gravity and electromagnetism, he never found, and teleparalel Gravity seemed to be dying as physicists to explore the strong and paradoxical world.
Over the years, theorists reviewed the Einstein model here and there, making it interesting to do anything buried in calculations. If they abandoned attempts to insert Einstein’s electromagnetism, the versions of teleparialism could be formulated, which were equivalent to the typical mathematical language of general relativity. In other words, if you are trying to fix a gravity problem, you can receive a basic model, curvature or torsium and you can achieve the same results.
Moreover, in 2017 a single observation was surprised the world of gravity theories. That year Observations of a neutron combination star revealed that the waves of gravity and electromagnetic waves reached the ground one in three seconds of each other-10 million crosses the distance of light years. This means that gravity and light traveling on the same speed. Many modified gravity theories planned small but significant differences between minor speeds, almost immediately rejected.
But the teleparialism lasted because gravity allows you to move at a light speed.
Compared to Einstein’s Magnum Opus, teleparallel Gravity has much more richer and complicated and more complicated and more complicated. It’s really saying something, considering that the overall relativity is made up of complex complex equations. The numerical complexity of teleparalelism is a blessing and curse. On the one hand, it still offers many opportunities to create gravity settings and settings that can last in all current experimental tests, still in the ways that explain dark matter and dark energy.
On the other hand, complexity establishes a wild learning curve for new theoreticals to make it more difficult for theory, the creation of feasible predictions and testing. And for a wider community, all this is a good idea based on television and What is rubbish Very difficult. And add-on complexity on relativity gives the theory Some disturbing ambiguities. It is not always clear that the rich mathematical structures can reliably reconnect with physical reality, such as mathematics You don’t just turn on your face when you try to apply in realistic scenarios. That is probably a lot of research on teleparallel gravity is largely mainly mainly.
However, progress has been made. Teleparalel questions about gravity follows two basic branches. An office examines its link with the same theory and general relativity. Einstein’s theory has had an experimental verification from the orbital orbits of the solar system to the behavior of black holes. Can teleparialism really feasible? In his protection, make black holes still look like black holes? It does Big Bang continues yet? Stars and galaxies still do Act like stars and galaxies?
So far, the answer seems to be yes. The use of the other horn of teleparalel research: use teleparialism to explain aspects of the universe left under the general relativity of Vanilla. For example, it is likely that the telepartment gravity version is still formulated, which still passes each experimental test The need for dark matter-The explanation Speed expansion of the universe. or resolve Hubble tension.
These attempts are only in the early stages. It is a huge evidence of the dark matter and the rapid expansion of the universe and hubble strain strain. Finding explanations for all, all observations are consistent and obeying is consistent, especially when dealing with a complex and misunderstood theory.
And then the challenge is even greater: the last skeptics themselves is to convince themselves, that is, it is a valid approach. This would make a tremendous effort, as the last arbitrator of nature. But there is a powerful payment: matching the great image of cosmos, if at least deletes one of the cosmological cosmologists. That’s a high order to lightly.
But who knows? Certainly, you don’t, yet it’s not yet. Maybe Einstein was fine, even though he didn’t realize it at the time. And everything needed was a little mischievous.
