Michael Arteta was “absolutely angry” by Michael Oliver’s decision, to remove Miles Lewis-Sekeli from the field in the first half of the game against Arsenal, Wolves (1: 0).
When the first half approached, Lewis-Sekii caught Matt Doject near the edge of the “Wolves” box, and the referee Oliver removed the 18-year-old player for serious violations.
“I can’t believe that Michael Oliver removed Lewis-Sekeli from there,” said Sky Sports Journalist Tim Sherwood, when VAR clung to an official in the field.
“Arsenal” won 1-0, thanks to the winner of the second half of Ricardo Calafior, after Joao Gomez was removed for two yellow cards, even more harsh challenge than Lewis-Ushkin against Timber. Artetta still failed to hide her frustration. Officials full-time.
“It’s clear and I’ll leave it to you, boys,” Artetta said Sky Sports:. “I am absolutely angry, but I will leave you with you, it is clear I don’t think my words to help.”
To the question whether Arsenal will appeal the removal, Artetta answered. “It’s the club’s decision on what is the best decision. It is obvious that we may not even need (present to the appeal).
“She is really happy now that the team won and found the way to win it. He is very worried about what is expected next, because he feels stronger that there is nothing to do with the action. “
Calafior. It was never a red card, Lewis-Sovin was outraged
At the same time, the winning Callafior also felt that it was not a red card for Lewis-Skeel, saying that the 18-year-old player was outraged by the break.
“It simply came to our notice then. I saw him on a break, he was so disappointed for the team. But in the end we won. So nothing didn’t happen, “said Calafior.
“He was sad, but now he is happy, because we have definitely won, he is a good footballer, a good boy, so we help him a lot.
“She is really happy now that the team won and found the way to win it. He is very worried about what is expected next, because he feels stronger that there is nothing to do with the action. “
Arteta admitted that Lewis-Sekini felt better after the team’s victory, but hopes that any appeal would lead to the defender to play the next games.
“She is really happy now that the team won and found the way to win it,” Artetta added. “He is very worried about what is expected next, because he feels stronger that there is nothing to do with the action.”
Arteta added at his press conference. “I hope that we don’t need (appealing) us. Allow the player to continue to do his job. “
As social networks responded to the Red Card of Lewis-Squel
Five Lewis-Squate Red Card Problems
Sky Sports Sam Blitz.
One, you don’t see red cards for it. “He is 70 people away from their own goal,” Tim Sherwood said. That’s the starting point. How can it have serious violations on the edge of “Arsenal” box?
And if it’s a serious violation for contact with Lewis-Squel, he has given seconds to perform that challenge. How could the 18-year young man have such an intention? We needed a healthier judgment.
Two – Var gave. The call for serious violation was verified and approved by Var Daren by England. See the top of common sense to an official who had repetitions, slows and time to fully evaluate it.
Three – Joao Gomez’s challenge was worse. How the wolf midfielder received yellow for a higher, more aggressive and more dangerous challenge, and Lewis-Sekili received his march, just confusing. The consistency did not even have half a meeting.
Four – Michael Oliver, apparently does not like to influence games too much. This is what PGMOL headed Howard Web last season, when Matteo Kovachic avoided the Red Card for “Manchester City” in “Arsenal”. Did he need to send him to Lewis-Sovli?
Five. Odd removals for Arsenal – Deklan Rice and Leandro Trossard were both removed to throw the ball, but after that we saw anyone. Joao Pedro’s penalty kick in Brighton, Although William Saliba received the ball. “Arsenal” gets strange decisions this season, and it seems that it has a great weight for them, so it’s not surprising that their fans are becoming more disappointed.