Shutterstock / Jorm Sangsork
If we can exchange the bodies, we could see and feel the world as others do. This idea is not only a favorite plot of Hollywood, but John Locke was a pioneer of philosopher philosophers and empirism. He used to explore one of the greatest philosophical sets of human status – is your subjective experience equal to others?
For Locke, the attractiveness of the body swap narration is the condemnation that lasts today. It is impossible to objectively measure the subjective experience. This gap of science is a problem.
Take the example spicyan objectively impaired measurement. Many studies indicate that women provide less pain relief than men, even in similar quantities; Things are worse for those of the excluded groups. Fortunately, Research now below Neurologists could rewrite how we communicate our sense of pain, to equalize the treatment of important treatments. A new perspective for everyone to answer the question for everyone to meet the perception of colors, also proved (see “Do we all see the red as the same color? We eventually have an answer”).
Trying to measure subjective energy levels is likely to describe as “Woo-Woo”
A color perception is one thingBut what happens more serious concepts, such as energy? Attempting to measure someone’s subjective energy levels could be felt beyond the research area so that they can be filed under “Woo-Woo”.
And yet, as describing our skin story (see “A fresh understanding of fatigue shows your energy return”), a fresh look at the connection of the body of the mind, along with biological energy production mechanisms in our cells, is revealing a new understanding of the lack of energy.
Such science is a coarse, worth a celebration. Initially, beyond objective measurement, working on understanding that it appears is not a way to ignite our fascination. Doctors will help them better understand and treat patients and all can live better. No Freaky Friday-No it is necessary to swap the body.
Themes:
